tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10365105.post8249723485146223749..comments2023-09-28T05:56:04.896-04:00Comments on In the Merry Old Land of Oz: Four is Fun.....JOhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15892606500707914021noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10365105.post-43472682773841663942008-10-01T01:05:00.000-04:002008-10-01T01:05:00.000-04:00I just had to leave another comment here, since th...I just had to leave another comment here, since the captcha is wonzh. What a lovely word, <I>wonzh</I>. I don't know what it means, but I bet I could work it into 4 or 5 sentences tomorrow. Wonzh! Even fun to type....Carol P.https://www.blogger.com/profile/17820349273932220071noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10365105.post-78065816356426570112008-10-01T01:04:00.000-04:002008-10-01T01:04:00.000-04:00I hope we're not to the point of having thoughtcri...I hope we're not to the point of having thoughtcrimes yet. 1984 was a few years ago, right?<BR/><BR/>But I agree with TGND -- put him on the stand and the jury is in the palm of his hand anyway.<BR/><BR/>I see he inherited the same selective hearing that the rest of us got. Apparently, it's genetic....Carol P.https://www.blogger.com/profile/17820349273932220071noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10365105.post-49020159705759913902008-09-29T23:32:00.000-04:002008-09-29T23:32:00.000-04:00ah my dear, while "intent" often makes one act mor...ah my dear, while "intent" often makes one act more egregious, generally speaking, one must first have the "bad act." proving a thought? hmmmm if you're going for criminal mischief, then you are at the "beyond a reasonable doubt" proof, which would be difficult. Bring him up on civil charges and you merely have to prove a "preponderance of the evidence." (50.1%) But I wouldn't recommend a jury trial with that cute face!!!!The Girl Next Doorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08106281074589247494noreply@blogger.com